Kazumasa Sugimoto, Yoshio Kobayashi, Nakabumi Kuroda, Issei Komuro
INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL 50(6) 723-730 2009年11月 査読有り
The cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) has been evaluated ill the United States and Europe, however, there is little information from Japan. The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in Japan. In-hospital and follow-up costs of 25 consecutive patients undergoing SES implantation in a de novo lesion were evaluated. A control group for comparison was composed of 25 consecutive patients undergoing bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in a de novo lesion before the introduction of SES. There was no significant difference in resource use between the SES and BMS groups. Procedural cost ((sic)1,049,200 +/- 208,793 versus (sic)896,590 +/- 117,984, P = 0.01) was higher in the SES group than in the BMS group because of the higher reimbursement price of SES ((sic)378,000 versus (sic)258,000). In-hospital cost ((sic)1,202,891 +/- 208,793 versus (sic)1,050,280 +/- 177,984, P < 0.01) was higher in patients treated with SES. Less target lesion revascularization (4% versus 20%, P = 0.2) in patients with SES reduced the difference aggregate 1-year cost was not significantly different ((sic) 1,479,481 +/- 284,343 versus (sic)1,463,640 +/- 495,803, P = 0.9). It is concluded that SES may be cost-effective even in Japan. (Int Heart J 2009; 50: 723-730)