研究者業績

基本情報

所属
千葉大学 環境リモートセンシング研究センター
学位
PhD in Computational mathematics and software development(Tomsk State University)

研究者番号
10815369
J-GLOBAL ID
201401069753930629
researchmap会員ID
7000007192

論文

 40
  • Alessandro Damiani, Hitoshi Irie, Dmitry A. Belikov, Shuei Kaizuka, Hossain Mohammed Syedul Hoque, Raul R. Cordero
    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22(18) 12705-12726 2022年9月29日  
    Abstract. This study investigated the spatiotemporal variabilitiesin nitrogen dioxide (NO2), formaldehyde (HCHO), ozone (O3), andlight-absorbing aerosols within the Greater Tokyo Area, Japan, which is the mostpopulous metropolitan area in the world. The analysis is based on totaltropospheric column, partial tropospheric column (within the boundarylayer), and in situ observations retrieved from multiple platforms as well as additionalinformation obtained from reanalysis and box model simulations. This studymainly covers the 2013–2020 period, focusing on 2020 when air quality wasinfluenced by the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Although total andpartial tropospheric NO2 columns were reduced by an average of about10 % in 2020, reductions exceeding 40 % occurred in some areas duringthe pandemic state of emergency. Light-absorbing aerosol levels within theboundary layer were also reduced for most of 2020, while smallerfluctuations in HCHO and O3 were observed. The significantly enhanceddegree of weekly cycling of NO2, HCHO, and light-absorbing aerosolfound in urban areas during 2020 suggests that, in contrast to othercountries, mobility in Japan also dropped on weekends. We conclude that,despite the lack of strict mobility restrictions in Japan, widespreadadherence to recommendations designed to limit the COVID-19 spread resultedin unique air quality improvements.
  • Dmitry Belikov, Naoko Saitoh, Prabir K. Patra
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 127(14) 2022年7月  査読有り筆頭著者責任著者
  • Dmitry A. Belikov, Naoko Saitoh, Prabir K. Patra, Naveen Chandra
    Remote Sensing 13(9) 1677-1677 2021年4月26日  査読有り筆頭著者責任著者
    We examined methane (CH4) variability over different regions of India and the surrounding oceans derived from thermal infrared (TIR) band observations (TIR CH4) by the Thermal and Near-infrared Sensor for carbon Observation—Fourier Transform Spectrometer (TANSO-FTS) onboard the Greenhouse gases Observation SATellite (GOSAT) for the period 2009–2014. This study attempts to understand the sensitivity of the vertical profile retrievals at different layers of the troposphere and lower stratosphere, on the basis of the averaging kernel (AK) functions and a priori assumptions, as applied to the simulated concentrations by the MIROC4.0-based Atmospheric Chemistry-Transport Model (MIROC4-ACTM). We stress that this is of particular importance when the satellite-derived products are analyzed using different ACTMs other than those used as retrieved a priori. A comparison of modeled and retrieved CH4 vertical profiles shows that the GOSAT/TANSO-FTS TIR instrument has sufficient sensitivity to provide critical information about the transport of CH4 from the top of the boundary layer to the upper troposphere. The mean mismatch between TIR CH4 and model is within 50 ppb, except for the altitude range above 150 hPa, where the sensitivity of TIR CH4 observations becomes very low. Convolved model profiles with TIR CH4 AK reduces the mismatch to less than the retrieval uncertainty. Distinct seasonal variations of CH4 have been observed near the atmospheric boundary layer (800 hPa), free troposphere (500 hPa), and upper troposphere (300 hPa) over the northern and southern regions of India, corresponding to the southwest monsoon (July–September) and post-monsoon (October–December) seasons. Analysis of the transport and emission contributions to CH4 suggests that the CH4 seasonal cycle over the Indian subcontinent is governed by both the heterogeneous distributions of surface emissions and the influence of the global monsoon divergent wind circulations. The major contrast between monsoon, and pre- and post-monsoon profiles of CH4 over Indian regions are noticed near the boundary layer heights, which is mainly caused by seasonal change in local emission strength with a peak during summer due to increased emissions from the paddy fields and wetlands. A strong difference between seasons in the middle and upper troposphere is caused by convective transport of the emission signals from the surface and redistribution in the monsoon anticyclone of upper troposphere. TIR CH4 observations provide additional information on CH4 in the region compared to what is known from in situ data and total-column (XCH4) measurements. Based on two emission sensitivity simulations compared to TIR CH4 observations, we suggest that the emissions of CH4 from the India region were 51.2 ± 4.6 Tg year−1 during the period 2009–2014. Our results suggest that improvements in the a priori profile shape in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UT/LS) region would help better interpretation of CH4 cycling in the earth’s environment.
  • Natella Rakhmatova, Mikhail Arushanov, Lyudmila Shardakova, Bakhriddin Nishonov, Raisa Taryannikova, Valeriya Rakhmatova, Dmitry A. Belikov
    Atmosphere 12(5) 527-527 2021年4月21日  査読有り責任著者
    The arid and semiarid regions of Uzbekistan are sensitive and vulnerable to climate change. However, the sparse and very unevenly distributed meteorological stations within the region provide limited data for studying the region’s climate variation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the performance of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA)-Interim and ERA5 products for the fields of near-surface temperature, humidity, and precipitation over Uzbekistan from 1981 to 2018 using observations from 74 meteorological stations. Major results suggested that the reanalysis datasets match well with most of the observed climate records, especially in the plain areas. While ERA5, with a high spatial resolution of 0.1°, is able more accurately reproduce mountain ranges and valleys. Compared to ERA-Interim, the climatological biases in temperature, humidity, and total precipitation from ERA5 are clearly reduced, and the representation of inter-annual variability is improved over most regions of Uzbekistan. Both reanalyses show a high level of agreement with observations on the standardized precipitation evaporation index (SPEI) with a correlation coefficient of 0.7–0.8.Although both of these ECMWF products can be successfully implemented for the calculation of atmospheric drought indicators for Uzbekistan and adjacent regions of Central Asia, the newer and advanced ERA5 is preferred.
  • Shamil Maksyutov, Tomohiro Oda, Makoto Saito, Rajesh Janardanan, Dmitry Belikov, Johannes W. Kaiser, Ruslan Zhuravlev, Alexander Ganshin, Vinu K. Valsala, Arlyn Andrews, Lukasz Chmura, Edward Dlugokencky, László Haszpra, Ray L. Langenfelds, Toshinobu Machida, Takakiyo Nakazawa, Michel Ramonet, Colm Sweeney, Douglas Worthy
    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 21(2) 1245-1266 2021年1月29日  査読有り
    Abstract. We developed a high-resolution surface flux inversion system based on the global Eulerian–Lagrangian coupled tracer transport model composed of the National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) transport model (TM; collectively NIES-TM) and the FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model (FLEXPART). The inversion system is named NTFVAR (NIES-TM–FLEXPART-variational) as it applies a variational optimization to estimate surface fluxes. We tested the system by estimating optimized corrections to natural surface CO2 fluxes to achieve the best fit to atmospheric CO2 data collected by the global in situ network as a necessary step towards the capability of estimating anthropogenic CO2 emissions. We employed the Lagrangian particle dispersion model (LPDM) FLEXPART to calculate surface flux footprints of CO2 observations at a spatial resolution of 0.1∘×0.1∘. The LPDM is coupled with a global atmospheric tracer transport model (NIES-TM). Our inversion technique uses an adjoint of the coupled transport model in an iterative optimization procedure. The flux error covariance operator was implemented via implicit diffusion. Biweekly flux corrections to prior flux fields were estimated for the years 2010–2012 from in situ CO2 data included in the Observation Package (ObsPack) data set. High-resolution prior flux fields were prepared using the Open-Data Inventory for Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide (ODIAC) for fossil fuel combustion, the Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS) for biomass burning, the Vegetation Integrative SImulator for Trace gases (VISIT) model for terrestrial biosphere exchange, and the Ocean Tracer Transport Model (OTTM) for oceanic exchange. The terrestrial biospheric flux field was constructed using a vegetation mosaic map and a separate simulation of CO2 fluxes at a daily time step by the VISIT model for each vegetation type. The prior flux uncertainty for the terrestrial biosphere was scaled proportionally to the monthly mean gross primary production (GPP) by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) MOD17 product. The inverse system calculates flux corrections to the prior fluxes in the form of a relatively smooth field multiplied by high-resolution patterns of the prior flux uncertainties for land and ocean, following the coastlines and fine-scale vegetation productivity gradients. The resulting flux estimates improved the fit to the observations taken at continuous observation sites, reproducing both the seasonal and short-term concentration variabilities including high CO2 concentration events associated with anthropogenic emissions. The use of a high-resolution atmospheric transport in global CO2 flux inversions has the advantage of better resolving the transported mixed signals from the anthropogenic and biospheric sources in densely populated continental regions. Thus, it has the potential to achieve better separation between fluxes from terrestrial ecosystems and strong localized sources, such as anthropogenic emissions and forest fires. Further improvements in the modelling system are needed as our posterior fit was better than that of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s CarbonTracker for only a fraction of the monitoring sites, i.e. mostly at coastal and island locations where background and local flux signals are mixed.

MISC

 17