丁 志映

This paper explores the concept of adaptability through a study of customization work on Indonesian multi-storey housing. Significant differences in interior plans and renovation, modification and customization methods in public rumah susun and private apartments enable small-scale post-occupancy adaptability using low-level industrialized building techniques. This study reveals the importance of the building system for enhancing building service life by differentiating building components according to users, decision control and customization method. The findings suggest two adaptability concepts for infill housing for rumah susun and apartments: adaptable design and affordable production.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the actual conditions of housing-share dwellings and explain its problem and possibility for the utilizing of that. And the results of investigation, it's emerging that housing-share dwellings was a house for the studio apartment as a saucer of single peoples various life. And though the house which was hard to accept in the rental house market, it had demand in the house as shared house. But market of housing-share dwellings is not increasing as much as make little progress, because of concern about lease system and worry for housing-share dwellings of the owner of a rented house. Therefore structure to promote housing-share dwellings is necessary.

Since 1994, Home Economics has been become compulsory for boys at Senior High School. However, within the field of Home Economics, only about 6 or 10 hours per year are allotted to "Homes and lifestyles". Therefore, it is difficult to engage the interest of students. The writer proposes changing of the teaching style from a conventional class to a practical lesson in which students make their own designs. The teaching material is "a practical lesson in spatial understanding using a triangular plan".

The purpose of this study is to investigate how residents of guest houses use the common space for their personal exchange according to three scale types-10 or fewer, 11 to 30, 31 or more people.<BR>The results are summarized as follows. 1) Most residents always use common space for exchanges such as common meal, chat, TV viewing. 2) The dormitory-room residents use common space frequently single-room residents. This is because many dormitory-room residents not to be disturbed for other residents of same room. 3) The guest houses of small scale (10 or fewer people) make communication easier between the residents. 4) The residents ask advice from landlord to resolve the problem in guest house.

The purpose of this study is (1) to investigate how dwellers encourage the sense of "group territoriality" in three types of houses-dormitory, collective house and one-bedroom apartment,(2) to obtain suggestions for the architectural planning of houses for small-size households.<BR>The results are summarized as follows. 1) Dwellers of one-bedroom apartments hardly have the sense of group territoriality because of the lack of neighborhood community, but the Collective house and the dormitory bring up the strong sense of it. 2) Most of dwellers in the Collective house show similar attitude and intention, that is, the group-oriented behaviors. 3) The dormitory is similar to the Collective house, butit has some flexibility to accept individual-oriented dwellers. 4) As for the survey, three types of houses have clear different tendencies toward the group territoriality.

The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate changes and relationship between individually-dominated space and private and/or public behavior in personal life cycle (PLC), and (2) to develop a housing conceptual framework on the basis of the current. Anbang part or communication through connection between "Person-Familly" and "Family-Society" The study involved an investigation of the dwelling history of urban residents from childhood to adulthood (or senescene). The subjects interviewed in the survey were 25 persons in a family council from the southern region of South Korea. The results are summarized ds follows. 1) The naming of individually-dominated space is typical of Korea and reflects her tradition. Anbans is of a symbol type and indicates a master and multi-purpose room. My Bang is of a user type and generally indicates a private room while Couple Bang or bedroom indicates a private room specifically used by a married couple. 2) As for the behavior in "Anbang," there was a tendency to change from the mixed behavior of public and private to the private behavior in PLC. In the case of "My Bang" and "Couple Bang/bedroom," the private behavior was mainly found. Through the change in the PLC, My Bang was mostly found in adolescence, it seemed only hobby behavior in adulthood. 3) There are four plan typps : Traditiona basic type, Maru (multi-purpose room) center type, Kosil (living room) center type, and the other type. The Traditional basic type is mainly found in childhood, and the Kosil center type is widely found in the adolescence to adulthood of PLC.

In South Korea the prospect of a rapidly aging society implies that, among thediverse needs of welfare and housing, interest in the housing problems of the woman's elderly is particularly high. The purpose of thisstudy is to investigate the preferred living environment by the married female workers after retirement. The data were collected frominterviews and questionnaire of 30 persons selected from the married female workers in Busan. The results are summarized as follows:(1) About half of them are going to work after retirement. it was correlated with factors such as occupational description, individual volitionto work, and years of continued service.(2) As for their residence, the residence of a proper scale was required with space convenient forcleaning, meal preparation, etc. rather than large scale of it. Moreover, the conditions of living environment for them, the distance andthe time required from a place of residence to a workplace were important.(3) They liked to more apartment than independent houseas a residence after retirement, even if they have had experience at the independent house in the childhood. The housing purchaseafter retirement was influenced by academic background and income.(4) The preferred living style after retirement was toshare the common space with other residents who have the same way of organizing a dwelling, but they desired to keep a private life.