内藤 亮

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been used to diagnose and stage lung cancer. Acquire™ Pulmonary and Expect™ Pulmonary dedicated EBUS-TBNA needles were introduced as the Franseen and Lancet needles, respectively. It is still unclear whether the Franseen or Lancet needles yield a higher quality specimen especially focusing on next-generation sequencing-based molecular testing. METHODS: A single-center, prospective study performed at the Chiba University Hospital randomly assigned patients to two groups: Group A, wherein the first and second EBUS-TBNA were performed using Lancet and Franseen needles, respectively, and Group B, wherein the first and second EBUS-TBNA were performed using Franseen and Lancet needles, respectively. Each specimen was compared and analyzed pathologically. The primary outcome was the histological tissue area except blood clot and the cellularity of each sample. We also examined the success rate of molecular testing. RESULTS: Twelve patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA between November 2022 and February 2023 were enrolled in this study. The tissue area of the specimens obtained by the Franseen and Lancet needles was 13.3 ± 6.4 mm2 and 10.6 ± 6.3 mm2, respectively (P = .355). The tumor cellularity in the specimens obtained using the Franseen and Lancet needles was 54.0 ± 30.3 and 46.2 ± 36.3%, respectively (P = .608). The success rate of molecular testing using the single-pass sample by Franseen needle was 85.7 and 57.1% by Lancet needle. No serious complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The Franseen needle tended to show a greater amount of specimen with higher tumor cellularity than the Lancet needle which may contribute higher success rate of molecular testing. Further studies must be conducted to validate the results of this study. KEY FINDINGS: What is known and what is new?  What is the implication, and what should change now?

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines discourage the use of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with respiratory diseases. Therefore, stratifications of the effectiveness of PAH-targeted therapies are important for this group. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to identify phenotypes that might benefit from initial PAH-targeted therapies in patients with PH associated with interstitial pneumonia and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. METHODS: We categorized 270 patients with precapillary PH (192 interstitial pneumonia, 78 combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema) into severe and mild PH using a pulmonary vascular resistance of 5 WU. We investigated the prognostic factors and compared the prognoses of initial (within 2 months after diagnosis) and noninitial treatment groups, as well as responders (improvements in World Health Organization functional class, pulmonary vascular resistance, and 6-minute walk distance) and nonresponders. RESULTS: Among 239 treatment-naive patients, 46.0% had severe PH, 51.8% had mild ventilatory impairment (VI), and 40.6% received initial treatment. In the severe PH with mild VI subgroup, the initial treatment group had a favorable prognosis compared with the noninitial treatment group. The response rate in this group was significantly higher than the others (48.2% vs 21.8%, ratio 2.21 [95% CI: 1.17-4.16]). In multivariate analysis, initial treatment was a better prognostic factor for severe PH but not for mild PH. Within the severe PH subgroup, responders had a favorable prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an increased number of responders to initial PAH-targeted therapy, with a favorable prognosis in severe PH cases with mild VI. A survival benefit was not observed in mild PH cases. (Multi-institutional Prospective Registry in Pulmonary Hypertension associated with Respiratory Disease; UMIN000011541).