古矢 丈雄

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus on neurological recovery and determine the relationship between moderate-severe diabetes and neurological recovery in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without bone injury. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 389 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with CSCI without bone injury across 33 medical institutes. The patients were divided into a nondiabetic group (n = 270) and a diabetic group (n = 119). Neurological outcomes were compared between the two groups through propensity score matching. The impact of moderate-severe diabetes (defined as hemoglobin A1c ≥ 7.0% or requiring insulin treatment) on neurological recovery was evaluated through multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Propensity score matching revealed no significant differences between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups in terms of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grade and mean total ASIA motor scores (AMS) at 6 months post-injury. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that age on admission (B = -0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.59 to -0.08; P = 0.01), dementia (B = -16.50; 95% CI, -24.99 to -8.01; P < 0.01), and baseline total AMS (B = -0.62; 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.51; P < 0.01) were negative predictors of neurological recovery at 6 months post-injury. The presence of moderate-severe diabetes did not influence neurological recovery at 6 months post-injury. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients with CSCI without bone injury achieved improvements in neurological function comparable to those of nondiabetic patients. Moderate-severe diabetes did not affect neurological recovery in patients with CSCI without bone injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: Palliative surgery is crucial for maintaining the quality of life (QOL) in patients with spinal metastases. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of QOL after palliative surgery between patients with metastatic spinal tumors at different segments. METHODS: We prospectively compared the data of 203 patients with spinal metastases at 2-3 consecutive segments who were divided into the following three groups: cervical, patients with cervical spine lesions; thoracic, patients with upper-middle thoracic spine lesions; and TL/L/S, patients with lesions at the thoracolumbar junction and lumbar and sacral regions. Preoperative and postoperative EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ5D) 5-level were compared. RESULTS: All groups exhibited improvement in the Frankel grade, performance status, pain, Barthel index, EQ5D health state utility value (HSUV), and EQ5D visual analog scale (VAS) postoperatively. Although preoperative EQ5D HSUVs did not significantly differ between the groups (cervical, 0.461 ± 0.291; thoracic, 0.321 ± 0.292; and TL/L/S, 0.376 ± 0.272), the thoracic group exhibited significantly lower postoperative EQ5D HSUVs than the other two groups (cervical, 0.653 ± 0.233; thoracic, 0.513 ± 0.252; and TL/L/S, 0.624 ± 0.232). However, postoperative EQ5D VAS was not significantly different between the groups (cervical, 63.4 ± 25.8; thoracic, 54.7 ± 24.5; and TL/L/S, 61.7 ± 21.9). CONCLUSIONS: Palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumors provided comparable QOL improvement, irrespective of the spinal segment involved. Patients with upper and middle thoracic spinal metastases had poorer QOL outcomes than those with metastases in other segments; however, sufficient QOL improvement was achieved.

INTRODUCTION: For older adults, dysphagia is a serious problem that can occur after spinal cord injury (SCI), but its risk factors are unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors for dysphagia in elderly patients (≥65 years) with cervical SCI. METHODS: This multicenter study included 707 patients with cervical SCI (mean age 75.3 years). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for patient characteristics and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI). RESULTS: Dysphagia occurred in 69 patients (9.8%). The significant factors were as follows: male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.43), GNRI <92 (1.83), dementia (2.94), fracture (3.40), complete paralysis (3.61), anterior surgery (3.74), and tracheostomy (17.06). Age was not identified as a risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Low GNRI before injury was one of the independent risk factors for dysphagia after geriatric cervical SCI. GNRI represents the comprehensive nutritional status of the elderly and reflects feeding function and its recovery capacity.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate postoperative outcomes in patients with spinal metastases of prostate cancer, with a focus on patient-oriented assessments. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter registry study involving 35 centers. A total of 413 patients enrolled in the Japanese Association for Spine Surgery and Oncology Multicenter Prospective Study of Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors were evaluated for inclusion. The eligible patients were followed for at least 1 year after surgery. The Frankel Classification, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, visual analog scale for pain, face scale, Barthel Index, vitality index, indications for oral pain medication, and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were used for evaluating functional status, activities of daily living, and patient motivation. RESULTS: Of the 413 eligible patients, 41 with primary prostate cancer were included in the study. The patient-oriented assessments indicated that the patients experienced postoperative improvements in quality of life and motivation in most items, with the improvements extending for up to 6 months. More than half of the patients with Frankel classifications B or C showed improved neurological function at 1 month after surgery, and most patients presented maintained or improved their classification at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention for spinal metastases of prostate cancer significantly improved neurological function, quality of life, and motivation of the patients. Consequently, our results support the validity of surgical intervention for improving the neurological function and overall well-being of patients with spinal metastases of prostate cancer.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: This research sought to develop a predictive model for surgical outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) using deep learning and machine learning (ML) techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Determining surgical outcomes assists surgeons in communicating prognosis to patients and setting their expectations. Deep learning and ML are computational models that identify patterns from large datasets and make predictions. METHODS: Of the 482 patients, 288 patients were included in the analysis. A minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as gain in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score of 2.5 points or more. The predictive model for MCID achievement at 1 year post-surgery was constructed using patient background, clinical symptoms, and preoperative imaging features (x-ray, CT, MRI) analyzed via LightGBM and deep learning with RadImagenet. RESULTS: The median preoperative JOA score was 11.0 (IQR: 9.0-12.0), which significantly improved to 14.0 (IQR: 12.0-15.0) at 1 year after surgery (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The average improvement rate of the JOA score was 44.7%, and 60.1% of patients achieved the MCID. Our model exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 and the accuracy of 71.9% in predicting MCID at 1 year. Preoperative JOA score and certain preoperative imaging features were identified as the most significant factors in the predictive models. CONCLUSION: A predictive ML and deep learning model for surgical outcomes in OPLL patients is feasible, suggesting promising applications in spinal surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.