中田 孝明

Background Timely and effective fluid resuscitation is vital for stabilizing sepsis while avoiding volume overload. We aimed to assess how the administration of a 30 mL/kg bolus fluid affects patients with sepsis within three hours of clinical outcomes. Methods This multicenter observational study included adult patients diagnosed with sepsis in 17 intensive care units at tertiary hospitals in Japan between July 2019 and August 2020. The clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis who received ≥30 mL/kg bolus fluid within three hours (30 × 3 group) were compared with those who received <30 mL/kg fluid (non-30 × 3 group). Results Of 172 eligible patients, 74 (43.0%) belonged to the 30 × 3 group, and 98 (57.0%) belonged to the non-30 × 3 group. The median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 9 (interquartile range (Q1-Q3): 7-11) in the 30 × 3 group and 7 (Q1-Q3: 4-9) in the non-30 × 3 group (P < 0.01). The 28-day mortality rate was 29.7% in the 30 × 3 group and 12.2% in the non-30 × 3 group (P < 0.01). However, the adjusted odds ratio by the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis with propensity score for the 28-day mortality rate of the 30 × 3 group compared with that in the non-30 × 3 group was 2.17 (95% confidence interval: 0.85-5.54). Among the propensity score-matched patients, the 28-day mortality rate was 30% in the 30 × 3 (n = 70) and non-30 × 3 (n = 95) groups, respectively (P = 0.72). Conclusions Patients with sepsis who received the 30 mL/kg bolus fluid within three hours experienced more severe clinical outcomes. However, it was not associated with the increased odds of the 28-day mortality.

Background The impact of intensive care unit (ICU) case volume on the mortality and medical costs of sepsis has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that ICU case volume is associated with mortality and medical costs in patients with sepsis in Japan. Methodology This retrospective nationwide study used the Japanese administrative data from 2010 to 2017. The ICU volume categorization into quartiles was performed according to the annual number of sepsis cases. The primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and medical costs, respectively. A mixed-effects logistic model with a two-level hierarchical structure was used to adjust for baseline imbalances. Fractional polynomials were investigated to determine the significance of the association between hospital volume and clinical outcomes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed for the primary outcome. Results Among 317,365 sepsis patients from 532 hospitals, the crude in-hospital mortality was 26.0% and 21.4% in the lowest and highest quartile of sepsis volume, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors, in-hospital mortality in the highest quartile was significantly lower than that of the lowest quartile (odds ratio = 0.829; 95% confidence interval = 0.794-0.865; p < 0.001). Investigations with fractional polynomials revealed that sepsis caseload was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. The highest quartile had higher daily medical costs per person compared to the lowest quartile. Subgroup analyses showed that high-volume ICUs with patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy, and renal replacement therapy had a significantly low in-hospital mortality. The sensitivity analysis, excluding patients who were transferred to other hospitals, demonstrated a result consistent with that of the primary test. Conclusions This nationwide study using the medical claims database suggested that a higher ICU case volume is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and higher daily medical costs per person in patients with sepsis.

BACKGROUND: It is important to determine the prevalence and prognosis of community-acquired infection (CAI) and nosocomial infection (NI) to develop treatment strategies and appropriate medical policies in aging society. METHODS: Patients hospitalized between January 2010 and December 2019, for whom culture tests were performed and antibiotics were administered, were selected using a national claims-based database. The annual trends in incidence and in-hospital mortality were calculated and evaluated by dividing the patients into four age groups. RESULTS: Of the 73,962,409 inpatients registered in the database, 9.7% and 4.7% had CAI and NI, respectively. These incidences tended to increase across the years in both the groups. Among the patients hospitalized with infectious diseases, there was a significant increase in patients aged ≥ 85 years (CAI: + 1.04%/year and NI: + 0.94%/year, P < 0.001), while there was a significant decrease in hospitalization of patients aged ≤ 64 years (CAI: -1.63%/year and NI: -0.94%/year, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the NI than in the CAI group (CAI: 8.3%; NI: 14.5%, adjusted mean difference 4.7%). The NI group had higher organ support, medical cost per patient, and longer duration of hospital stay. A decreasing trend in mortality was observed in both the groups (CAI: -0.53%/year and NI: -0.72%/year, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present analysis of a large Japanese claims database showed that NI is a significant burden on hospitalized patients in aging societies, emphasizing the need to address particularly on NI.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe empiric antimicrobial options for patients with community-onset sepsis using nationwide real-world data from Japan. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used nationwide Japanese data from a medical reimbursement system database. Patients aged ≥20 years with both presumed infections and acute organ dysfunction who were admitted to hospitals from the outpatient department or emergency department between 2010 and 2017 were enrolled. We described the initial choices of antimicrobials for patients with sepsis stratified by intensive care unit (ICU) or ward. RESULTS: There were 1,195,741 patients with community-onset sepsis; of these, 1,068,719 and 127,022 patients were admitted to the wards and ICU, respectively. Third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenem were most commonly used for patients with community-onset sepsis. We found that 1.7% and 6.0% of patients initially used antimicrobials for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus coverage in the wards and ICU, respectively. Although half of the patients initially used antipseudomonal agents, only a few patients used a combination of antipseudomonal agents. Moreover, few patients initially used a combination of antimicrobials to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas sp. CONCLUSION: Third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenem were most frequently used for patients with sepsis. A combination therapy of antimicrobials for drug-resistant bacteria coverage was rarely provided to these patients.