巽 浩一郎

INTRODUCTION: To date, there is limited evidence on the effects of bronchodilators on respiratory dynamics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a novel radiographic modality that provides real-time, objective and quantifiable kinetic data, including changes in the lung area (Rs), tracheal diameter, diaphragmatic kinetics and pulmonary ventilation during respiration, at a lower radiation dose than that used by fluoroscopic or CT imaging. However, the therapeutic effect of dual bronchodilators on respiratory kinetics, such as chest wall dynamics and respiratory muscle function, has not yet been prospectively evaluated using DCR. AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effects of bronchodilator therapy on respiratory kinetics in patients with COPD using DCR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an open-label, prospective, single-centre, non-controlled, comparative study. A total of 35 patients with COPD, aged 40-85 years, with a forced expiratory volume in the first second of 30-80%, will be enrolled. After a 2-4 weeks washout period, patients will receive tiotropium/olodaterol therapy for 6 weeks. Treatment effects will be evaluated based on DCR findings, pulmonary function test results and patient-related outcomes obtained before and after treatment. The primary endpoint is the change in Rs after therapy. The secondary endpoints include differences in other DCR parameters (diaphragmatic kinetics, tracheal diameter change and maximum pixel value change rate), pulmonary function test results and patient-related outcomes between pre-therapy and post-therapy values. All adverse events will be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Chiba University Hospital. The results of this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs032210543.

BACKGROUND: The contemporary outcome of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of CTEPH patients treated with BPA and PEA in Japan. METHODS: Among 1,270 participants enrolled between 2018 and 2023 in the CTEPH AC (Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Anticoagulant) registry, a Japanese nationwide CTEPH registry, 369 treatment-naive patients (BPA strategy: n = 313; PEA strategy: n = 56) and 690 on-treatment patients (BPA strategy: n = 561; PEA strategy: n = 129) were classified according to the presence of prior reperfusion therapy. Morbidity and mortality events (all-cause death, rescue mechanical reperfusion therapy, and/or initiation of parenteral pulmonary vasodilators), pulmonary hemodynamics, exercise tolerance, and relevant laboratory test results were evaluated. RESULTS: The BPA strategy was chosen in older patients than the PEA strategy (mean age, BPA vs PEA: 66.5 ± 12.6 years vs 62.5 ± 11.8 years; P = 0.028). Median follow-up period was 615 (Q1-Q3: 311-997) days in treatment-naive patients and 1,136 (Q1-Q3: 684-1,300) days in on-treatment patients. BPA strategy had as acceptable morbidity and mortality as PEA strategy (5-year morbidity and mortality event rate, BPA vs PEA: 10.2% [95% CI: 5.2%-19.5%] vs 16.1% [95% CI: 4.3%-50.6%] in treatment-naive patients; 9.7% [95% CI: 6.7%-13.8%] vs 6.9% [95% CI: 2.7%-17.3%] in on-treatment patients), with greater improvement of renal function; glomerular filtration rate in propensity score-matched population (difference between change: 4.9 [95% CI: 0.5-9.3] mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: BPA strategy was more frequently chosen in older patients compared with PEA strategy and showed acceptable outcomes for efficacy with greater advantage for improvement in renal function. (Multicenter registry of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in Japan; UMIN000033784).

BACKGROUND: Serum levels of stratifin (SFN), a member of the 14-3-3 protein family, increase in patients with drug-induced lung injury associated with diffuse alveolar damage. Therefore, we hypothesised that SFN levels would be higher in those experiencing acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD). A secondary analysis was also planned to determine whether SFN levels could discriminate survival in those with AE. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with clinically stable ILD (CS-ILD) and 22 patients with AE-ILD were examined to assess whether high serum SFN levels were associated with AE-ILD and whether SFN levels reflected disease severity or prognosis in patients with AE-ILD. RESULTS: Serum SFN levels were higher in the AE-ILD group than in the CS-ILD group (8.4 ± 7.6 vs. 1.3 ± 1.2 ng/mL, p < 0.001). The cut-off value of the serum SFN concentration for predicting 90-day and 1-year survival was 6.6 ng/mL. SFN levels were higher in patients who died within 90 days and 1 year than in patients who survived beyond these time points (13.5 ± 8.7 vs. 5.6 ± 5.3 ng/mL; p = 0.011 and 13.1 ± 7.5 vs. 3.1 ± 1.9 ng/mL; p < 0.001, respectively) in the AE-ILD group. When this cut-off value was used, the 90-day and 1-year survival rates were significantly better in the population below the cut-off value than in those above the cut-off value (p = 0.0017 vs. p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: High serum SFN levels are associated with AE-ILD and can discriminate survival in patients with AE-ILD.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines discourage the use of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with respiratory diseases. Therefore, stratifications of the effectiveness of PAH-targeted therapies are important for this group. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to identify phenotypes that might benefit from initial PAH-targeted therapies in patients with PH associated with interstitial pneumonia and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. METHODS: We categorized 270 patients with precapillary PH (192 interstitial pneumonia, 78 combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema) into severe and mild PH using a pulmonary vascular resistance of 5 WU. We investigated the prognostic factors and compared the prognoses of initial (within 2 months after diagnosis) and noninitial treatment groups, as well as responders (improvements in World Health Organization functional class, pulmonary vascular resistance, and 6-minute walk distance) and nonresponders. RESULTS: Among 239 treatment-naive patients, 46.0% had severe PH, 51.8% had mild ventilatory impairment (VI), and 40.6% received initial treatment. In the severe PH with mild VI subgroup, the initial treatment group had a favorable prognosis compared with the noninitial treatment group. The response rate in this group was significantly higher than the others (48.2% vs 21.8%, ratio 2.21 [95% CI: 1.17-4.16]). In multivariate analysis, initial treatment was a better prognostic factor for severe PH but not for mild PH. Within the severe PH subgroup, responders had a favorable prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an increased number of responders to initial PAH-targeted therapy, with a favorable prognosis in severe PH cases with mild VI. A survival benefit was not observed in mild PH cases. (Multi-institutional Prospective Registry in Pulmonary Hypertension associated with Respiratory Disease; UMIN000011541).