Hajime Kasai, Akane Matsumura, Toshihiko Sugiura, Ayako Shigeta, Nobuhiro Tanabe, Ryogo Ema, Yoriko Sakurai, Misuzu Yahaba, Yukiko Matsuura, Naoko Kawata, Seiichiro Sakao, Koichiro Tatsumi
Respiratory investigation 53(5) 210-6 2015年9月 査読有り
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is an important parameter in the management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and numerous noninvasive methods for PVR prediction have been proposed. However, a systematic evaluation of the methods that are specific for CTEPH has not been conducted. We compared a variety of echocardiography-derived prediction indices with direct right heart catheterization (RHC) to identify the most reliable noninvasive indicator of PVR in patients with CTEPH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Echocardiography and RHC were performed sequentially in 40 patients (mean age: 62.4±11.4 years; 30 females) with CTEPH. We measured the peak flow velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (TRV), tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient (TRPG), right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) time-velocity integral (TVIRVOT), left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) time-velocity integral (TVILVOT), cardiac output at RVOT (CORVOT), and the LVOT (COLVOT) using echocardiography. The parameters TRV/TVIRVOT, TRV/TVILVOT, TRV/CORVOT, TRV/COLVOT, TRPG/TVIRVOT, TRPG/TVILVOT, TRPG/CORVOT, and TRPG/COLVOT were then calculated to predict the PVR. Finally, correlations between these echocardiographic predictors of PVR and the PVR data obtained from RHC (PVRRHC) were assessed. RESULTS: The mean pulmonary arterial pressure and PVRRHC were 32.1±11.4mmHg and 5.4±2.9 Wood units, respectively. TRV/TVIRVOT, TRV/TVILVOT, TRV/COLVOT, TRPG/TVIRVOT, TRPG/TVILVOT, TRPG/CORVOT, and TRPG/COLVOT were all significantly correlated with the PVRRHC, and TRPG/COLVOT was the most strongly correlated with the PVRRHC (r=0.807, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic measurement of TRPG/COLVOT is a reliable noninvasive predictor of PVR in CTEPH patients.