山内 かづ代

BACKGROUND: Addressing the shortage of healthcare professionals in rural Japan poses significant challenges. At Sanmu Medical Center, incorporating resident physicians into a general medicine training program has proved effective in retaining them as supervising physicians. This study aims to identify the key factors contributing to the success of such programs. METHODS: We used a qualitative research design to comprehensively understand the factors contributing to physician retention in regional community hospitals in areas with physician shortages. Interviews were conducted with four experienced physicians, including the center director, who participated in the general or family medicine training programs at Sanmu Medical Center. Using a semi-structured questionnaire, we explored the factors influencing physician retention in community-based hospitals experiencing shortages. Two physicians specializing in community medicine conducted a content analysis under the supervision of three experts in community-oriented medical education and qualitative research. This approach helped compare retention factors perceived by physicians and the center director. RESULTS: Content analysis revealed 10 categories and 47 subcategories. The analysis revealed that "Educational activity" and "Supervising physicians and guidance system" are crucial for physician retention in rural hospitals in Japan. The study highlighted key educational factors contributing to retention: engagement in educational activities led to personal and professional growth, creating a rewarding experience for the physicians. Furthermore, a structured supervising physician system provided essential guidance and mentorship, improving the educational environment. Diverse learning opportunities and protected learning times were identified as critical for fostering a sustainable commitment among physicians to work in rural settings. These findings contribute to existing literature by detailing how structured educational activities and mentorship programs in rural hospital settings can significantly impact physician retention. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based medical education programs that focus on diverse clinical settings, mentorship, and a supportive work environment can enhance physician retention in rural areas. By fostering such educational and professional environments, healthcare institutions can address physician maldistribution and improve care quality in underserved communities. Our study offers practical insights that can be replicated or adapted by other rural hospitals facing similar challenges. It offers targeted strategies to address the unique challenges faced by female physicians in rural healthcare settings.

BACKGROUND: Generative artificial intelligence (GAI), represented by large language models, have the potential to transform health care and medical education. In particular, GAI's impact on higher education has the potential to change students' learning experience as well as faculty's teaching. However, concerns have been raised about ethical consideration and decreased reliability of the existing examinations. Furthermore, in medical education, curriculum reform is required to adapt to the revolutionary changes brought about by the integration of GAI into medical practice and research. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes the impact of GAI on medical education curricula and explores strategies for adaptation. METHODS: The study was conducted in the context of faculty development at a medical school in Japan. A workshop involving faculty and students was organized, and participants were divided into groups to address two research questions: (1) How does GAI affect undergraduate medical education curricula? and (2) How should medical school curricula be reformed to address the impact of GAI? The strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat (SWOT) framework was used, and cross-SWOT matrix analysis was used to devise strategies. Further, 4 researchers conducted content analysis on the data generated during the workshop discussions. RESULTS: The data were collected from 8 groups comprising 55 participants. Further, 5 themes about the impact of GAI on medical education curricula emerged: improvement of teaching and learning, improved access to information, inhibition of existing learning processes, problems in GAI, and changes in physicians' professionality. Positive impacts included enhanced teaching and learning efficiency and improved access to information, whereas negative impacts included concerns about reduced independent thinking and the adaptability of existing assessment methods. Further, GAI was perceived to change the nature of physicians' expertise. Three themes emerged from the cross-SWOT analysis for curriculum reform: (1) learning about GAI, (2) learning with GAI, and (3) learning aside from GAI. Participants recommended incorporating GAI literacy, ethical considerations, and compliance into the curriculum. Learning with GAI involved improving learning efficiency, supporting information gathering and dissemination, and facilitating patient involvement. Learning aside from GAI emphasized maintaining GAI-free learning processes, fostering higher cognitive domains of learning, and introducing more communication exercises. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the profound impact of GAI on medical education curricula and provides insights into curriculum reform strategies. Participants recognized the need for GAI literacy, ethical education, and adaptive learning. Further, GAI was recognized as a tool that can enhance efficiency and involve patients in education. The study also suggests that medical education should focus on competencies that GAI hardly replaces, such as clinical experience and communication. Notably, involving both faculty and students in curriculum reform discussions fosters a sense of ownership and ensures broader perspectives are encompassed.