Alessandro Damiani, Hitoshi Irie, Takashi Horio, Tamio Takamura, Pradeep Khatri, Hideaki Takenaka, Takashi Nagao, Takashi Y. Nakajima, Raul R. Cordero
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 11(4) 2501-2521 2018年4月27日 査読有り
Abstract. Observations from the new Japanese
geostationary satellite Himawari-8 permit quasi-real-time estimation of
global shortwave radiation at an unprecedented temporal resolution. However,
accurate comparisons with ground-truthing observations are essential to
assess their uncertainty. In this study, we evaluated the Himawari-8 global
radiation product AMATERASS using observations recorded at four SKYNET
stations in Japan and, for certain analyses, from the surface network of the
Japanese Meteorological Agency in 2016. We found that the spatiotemporal
variability of the satellite estimates was smaller than that of the ground
observations; variability decreased with increases in the time step and
spatial domain. Cloud variability was the main source of uncertainty in the
satellite radiation estimates, followed by direct effects caused by aerosols
and bright albedo. Under all-sky conditions, good agreement was found between
satellite and ground-based data, with a mean bias in the range of
20–30 W m−2 (i.e., AMATERASS overestimated ground observations) and a
root mean square error (RMSE) of approximately 70–80 W m−2. However,
results depended on the time step used in the validation exercise, on the
spatial domain, and on the different climatological regions. In particular,
the validation performed at 2.5 min showed largest deviations and RMSE
values ranging from about 110 W m−2 for the mainland to a maximum of
150 W m−2 in the subtropical region. We also detected a limited
overestimation in the number of clear-sky episodes, particularly at the pixel
level. Overall, satellite-based estimates were higher under overcast
conditions, whereas frequent episodes of cloud-induced enhanced surface
radiation (i.e., measured radiation was greater than expected clear-sky
radiation) tended to reduce this difference. Finally, the total mean bias was
approximately 10–15 W m−2 under clear-sky conditions, mainly because
of overall instantaneous direct aerosol forcing efficiency in the range of
120–150 W m−2 per unit of aerosol optical depth (AOD). A seasonal
anticorrelation between AOD and global radiation differences was evident at
all stations and was also observed within the diurnal cycle.